Process optimisation

Finding where the work actually stalls, and fixing that before any software is bought. Automating a broken process only makes it fail faster.

Often the answer is not software

Sometimes a form has four approvals where one would do. We will say so, even though it is the smaller invoice.

Benefits

Time back, measured

We time the work before and after, so the improvement is a number rather than a feeling.

Fewer handoffs

Every handoff is a queue and a chance to lose something. Most processes have more than they need.

Changes people will actually keep

Designed with the staff doing the job, so the new way survives the first busy week.

What it covers

Process mapping from observation

We watch the work rather than run a workshop about it. What people describe and what people do are rarely the same process.

Bottleneck analysis

Where the queue forms, how long things wait, and what that costs per month. Measured on your real volumes.

Approval and exception review

The approvals nobody remembers adding, and the exceptions that have quietly become the rule.

Redesign and pilot

A new flow tried on one team or one branch first, so the risk of getting it wrong is small.

How the work runs

  1. Observe

    A few days with the people doing the work, timing it and asking why.

  2. Measure

    Volumes, wait times and rework, so the case for change is arithmetic rather than opinion.

  3. Redesign

    A simpler flow, designed with the team, with the trade-offs named.

  4. Pilot and roll out

    One team first. If it does not hold up there, it does not go further.

Tell us which process is costing you the most

Talk to us