Finding where the work actually stalls, and fixing that before any software is bought. Automating a broken process only makes it fail faster.

Sometimes a form has four approvals where one would do. We will say so, even though it is the smaller invoice.
We time the work before and after, so the improvement is a number rather than a feeling.
Every handoff is a queue and a chance to lose something. Most processes have more than they need.
Designed with the staff doing the job, so the new way survives the first busy week.
We watch the work rather than run a workshop about it. What people describe and what people do are rarely the same process.
Where the queue forms, how long things wait, and what that costs per month. Measured on your real volumes.
The approvals nobody remembers adding, and the exceptions that have quietly become the rule.
A new flow tried on one team or one branch first, so the risk of getting it wrong is small.
A few days with the people doing the work, timing it and asking why.
Volumes, wait times and rework, so the case for change is arithmetic rather than opinion.
A simpler flow, designed with the team, with the trade-offs named.
One team first. If it does not hold up there, it does not go further.